Surface Hippy - Patient to Patient Guide To Hip Resurfacing

Serving The Patient Community Since 12/11/2005     Patricia Walter Owner/Webmaster

ASR Medical Study of 300 Implants

Lessons learned from early clinical experience and results of 300 ASR® hip resurfacing implantations
 
Journal Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine
Publisher Professional Engineering Publishing
ISSN 0954-4119
Issue Volume 220, Number 2 / 2006
DOI 10.1243/095441105X69079
Pages 345-353
  1. Hart, Radek (2007) Intraoperative navigation in hip surface arthroplasty: a radiographic comparative analysis study. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
    [CrossRef]

Authors

T Siebel1, S Maubach1, M M Morlock2

1Orthopaedic Department, Knappschaftskrankenhaus Püttlingen, Püttlingen, Germany
2Biomechanics Section, TUHH Hamburg University of Technology, Hamburg, Germany


Abstract

Between August 2003 and April 2005, 300 ASR® metal-on-metal resurfacing hip endoprostheses were implanted by the first author and a fellow surgeon. The mean age at surgery was 56.8 years (18-75.9 years) and mean body mass index was 27.6 kg/m2 (range, 19-41 kg/m2). The mean follow-up time was 202 days. The mean Harris hip score improved from 44 pre-operatively to 89 at 3 months post-operatively. In total, eight (2.7 per cent) cases [five neck fractures (1.66 per cent) and three cup revisions (1 per cent)] were revised. Two neck fractures occurred within a group of seven cases of femoral neck notching detected postoperatively; one neck fracture occurred out of two cases of incomplete seating of the femoral implant. A significantly higher (p< 0.001) failure rate was observed for patients who had undergone a previous osteosynthesis of the proximal femur (three revisions in a group of 15 patients). Revision cases had a significantly greater body mass index (p = 0.031). A learning curve was evident from the reduction in revisions from 5 in the first 100 surgical procedures to 2 in the next 100 and 1 in the last 100. These results show the importance of accurate surgical technique and careful patient selection for fourth-generation hip resurfacing implants.

 

L10 Web Stats Reporter 3.15 LevelTen Hit Counter - Free PHP Web Analytics Script
LevelTen dallas web development firm - website design, flash, graphics & marketing
Advertisement

Hip Resurfacing News



View My Stats

 

Web design by Patricia Walter Copyright Surface Hippy 12/11/2005

Statistics Page

Mission Statement - Surface Hippy is a patient to patient guide to hip resurfacing. It does not provide medical advice. It is designed to support, not to replace, the relationship between patient and clinician.
Advertising - Revenue from this site is derived from commercial advertising and individual donations.
Any advertisement is distinguished by the word "advertisement"
Privacy - Surface Hippy does not share email addresses or personal information with any group or organization.
Content - Surface Hippy is not controlled or influenced by any medical companies, doctors or hospitals.
All content is controlled by Patricia Walter  -
Joint Health Sites  LLC
This site is published by Joint Health Sites LLC, which is solely responsible for its content.
The advertisements on this site are not intended by the advertisers as an endorsement of the site's content.
The advertisers shall not be liable for any errors or omissions in the site's content,
nor liable for any damages from any person's actions based in reliance on the site's content.