Surface Hippy is Patricia Walter's
Personal Project to help people lean about Hip Resurfacing Patricia is the
fulltime author, editor, webmaster and owner of the site
N P Jones1, L C Anderton1, F M Cheong2, A Whallett3, M R Stanford2, P I Murray3,
S Lesnik-Oberstein4 and C Pavesio4
1The Royal Eye Hospital Manchester, UK
2St Thomas' Hospital London, UK
3Birmingham & Midland Eye Centre Birmingham, UK
4Moorfields Eye Hospital London, UK
Correspondence to: N P Jones, Consultant Ophthalmic Surgeon Manchester Royal Eye
Hospital Oxford Road Manchester M13 9WH, UK Tel: 0161 276 5628 Fax: 0161 272
6618 E-mail: njones@central.cmht.nwest.nhs.uk
Abstract
Aims To estimate the prevalence of low bone density and osteoporosis in a
population of patients with uveitis taking systemic steroid treatment; to
clarify the risks of steroid-induced fracture and to suggest a protocol for the
prevention and management of bone loss in patients with ophthalmic inflammatory
disease.
Methods Bone densitometry was performed on 129 adult patients with prednisolone-treated
uveitis from four centres. Information on uveitis diagnosis, associated risk
factors, steroid dosage and treatment duration, prophylaxis and management, was
collected. Juveniles, patients with scleritis and those who had used deflazacort,
were excluded.
Results Steroid treatment time varied from 13 weeks to 31 years, and the total
dosage from 1.29 g to 166.5 g. Twenty-six percent of patients also used one or
more immunosuppressives. Forty-eight percent had additional risk factors for
bone loss. Bone density was abnormally low in 44.2%, and 15.5% had osteoporosis.
Osteoporosis was substantially more common in males (20.6%, all under 60 yrs)
than in females (9.8%). Seven symptomatic fractures occurred in patients on
treatment. Bone loss correlated with total steroid dose, mean dose, duration of
treatment and the presence of pre-existing risk factors.
Conclusions The prevalence of steroid-induced osteoporosis and fracture is low
for patients with uveitis but young males are at risk. Patients at high risk
should be identified, and prophylaxis and treatment should be used as required.
The guideline of the National Osteoporosis Society is recommended as a
management protocol.
uveitis; ocular inflammatory disease; corticosteroids; bone densitometry;
osteopenia; osteoporosis; fracture
Results
One
hundred and twenty-nine patients were included in the study, of whom 68
(53%) were male and 61 (47%) female. One hundred and nine (84.5%) were
Caucasian, six (4.6%) black and 14 from other racial groups. The age at
densitometry ranged from 19 to 88, and the age distribution for both
sexes is shown in Figure 2a and b. The causes of
uveitis where known, or the main manifestations of inflammation, are
shown in Table 1.
Treatment time varied from 13 weeks to 31 years (mean 3.6 years). The
cumulative dose ranged from 1290 mg to 166 559 mg (mean 16849 mg) and
the mean dose ranged from 2.8 mg/day to 41 mg/day
(mean 13.6 mg/day).
At some time during treatment a total of 34 patients (26.4%) also
received treatment with immunosuppressives (up to three drugs) as
steroid-sparing or preferred medication. The drugs involved are shown in
Table 2. In addition, eight patients received
intramuscular depot injections and four patients intravenous pulses, of
methylprednisolone.
A total of 62 patients (48%) had one to four potential risk factors
for osteoporosis prior to the commencement of steroid treatment, as
shown in Table 3. Seventeen patients (13.2%) used
prophylaxis against bone loss; 12 with Calcium ±
Vitamin D3; four with hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and one with
both of these.
Bone densitometry was within the normal range in 72 patients (55.8%)
but was low in the remainder, 37 (28.7%) having osteopenia and 20
(15.5%) osteoporosis. Of the 20 osteoporotics, 14 were male and six
female. Comparing these two groups, pre-existing risk factors were
identified in 6/6 osteoporotic women and 9/14
men; the mean steroid dose was 13.6 mg/day
for men, but 18.9 mg/day for women. The total
steroid dose was 30.1 g for men compared to 20.4 g for women; the mean
treatment duration was 6.4 yrs for osteoporotic men, but 4 yrs for
women. None of these treatment parameters were significantly different
between males and females.
Overall 57 patients (44.2%) had low bone density; in 32 of these
cases the maximally-affected site was specified in the densitometry
report; in 23 of these the lower spine was most affected, and the hip in
nine. Eight symptomatic fractures occurred in seven patients (five men,
two women) during steroid treatment; three had normal bone densitometry,
one had osteopenia and three had (established) osteoporosis.
Discussion
Systemic steroid treatment induces bone loss in several ways; doses
greater than 10 mg/day inhibit dietary
calcium absorption; suppression of androgen production depresses
oestrone levels and suppresses the calcitonin response, leading to
increased bone reabsorption; osteoclasis is stimulated; and bone
formation is reduced. Bone loss is inevitable during steroid therapy and
commences within days of starting treatment. The rate of loss is
greatest within the first 6 months, during which time typically 4-5%
of bone is lost.5
Eventually osteoporosis occurs in up to 50% of patients.6
Trabecular bone is particularly affected, so effects are more marked in
the spine (where steroid treatment is responsible for up to 20% of all
crush fractures7)
and proximal femur. Overall, the prevalence of symptomatic or
asymptomatic fractures in patients treated with systemic steroids is
between 11 and 20%;8
this represents a 2.5-3 times increased risk
of fracture compared with a control population.9
Bone density may be assessed by plain radiography, quantitative
computed tomography, ultrasonography or absorptiometry using photons or
X-rays.10 DEXA
scanning is now the most widely available technique in the UK and was
used in this study. It is rapid, taking less than 5 min per site, uses
little radiation (less than 1 Sv
for a spine scan) and is relatively inexpensive. There are problems of
reproducibility in any method of bone densitometry, between machines and
longitudinally in a single patient. Data should therefore be interpreted
within these limitations, and it should be noted that DEXA assessments
in this series were made on at least four different machines.
Our study of 129 patients has shown a high incidence of bone loss but
a low incidence of fracture. The presence of pre-existing risk factors
correlated strongly with bone loss (Table 4). There
was also a trend towards higher total steroid dose (normal = 14.8 g,
osteoporosis = 27.2 g), mean steroid dose (normal 13.6 mg, osteoporosis
15.2 mg) and treatment time (normal 2.8 yrs, osteoporosis 5.6 yrs), in
association with bone loss (Table 4). However, none
of these parameters reached statistical significance for this sample.
Some diseases have an intrinsic risk of bone loss. Steroid-treated
rheumatoid arthritis has a high rate of osteoporosis in comparison to
asthma or polymyalgia rheumatica, but these also carry some intrinsic
risk.11,12,13
The prevalence of low bone density has not been investigated in patients
with ophthalmic inflammatory disease, but one previous study examined 15
patients with steroid-treated thyroid eye disease14
and found that four were osteoporotic, and a study of 602 patients with
various ocular inflammatory diseases identified 17 pathological
fractures (2.8%).15
The selection of patients for our study was neither comprehensive nor
prospective and the results cannot reliably be extrapolated to a wider
population. However, it is likely that patients included were selected
for perceived risk. Because of this sampling bias, it is most unlikely
that these 129 patients represented an underestimate of steroid-induced
bone loss in uveitis patients. In our cohort the prevalence of
osteoporosis was 15% and the symptomatic fracture rate, 6%. Indeed, only
four patients with low bone density suffered a fracture (3% of all
patients), which represents one such event per 118 patients treatment
years. The reported prevalence of osteoporosis and fracture in other
disease groups is substantially higher, including a 34% rate of
vertebral fracture in rheumatoid arthritis treated with 5 mg/day
or more of prednisolone over 5 yrs16
and a 42% rate of fracture in asthmatics on high-dose prednisolone.17
Uveitis per se shows no evidence of an intrinsic risk of bone
loss.
Some patients (indeed, nearly half of our patients) taking systemic
steroid treatment had additional risks for osteoporosis and it is
important to identify these (Table 3). Eighteen
women were post-menopausal and nine had pregnancies during treatment.
Three had previous episodes of amenorrhoea or had undergone
oophorectomy, both of which are potent causes of osteoporosis.18
Smoking (11% of this cohort) accelerates bone resorption and in women,
accelerates the menopause and catabolises oestrogens thereafter. Some
patients with sarcoidosis have hypercalcuria and lose bone. Osteoporosis
is weakly associated with inflammatory bowel disease, partly because of
malabsorption.19
Inflammatory arthropathy, particularly rheumatoid arthritis20
leads to bone loss, not least because of decreased mobility; total
immobilisation leads to bone resorption at a rate of 1% per week. Type 1
diabetics have on average a 10% reduction in bone mass;21
type 2 diabetics are less severely affected. Anorexia or poor diet, low
body weight, associated amenorrhoea and hypercortisolism can cause rapid
osteoporosis.22
Bone loss also occurs in hypogonadal males, in hyperparathyroidism,
after heparin treatment23
and in alcoholism24
(it is now recognised that bone loss may occur with only moderate
alcohol intake, at least in women,25
implying that patients should be encouraged to reduce intake if
necessary).
The value of drug prophylaxis against bone loss in those at risk has
been the subject of intensive research, and as yet firm conclusions are
lacking. Calcium and vitamin D supplementation have been shown to
ameliorate bone loss26
and bisphosphonates unarguably reduce bone loss and replenish bone once
lost.5,27
Other drugs such as calcitriol28
and calcitonin29
prove beneficial in some circumstances. However, the only adverse event
associated with bone loss is bone fracture, and the effect of
prophylaxis on fracture prevalence has not been conclusively
established. Nevertheless there is now a medical consensus on the need
to treat in some circumstances.
The National Osteoporosis Society (NOS), in association with The
British Society for Rheumatology, the Royal Society of Medicine and
others, has published guidelines on the prevention and management of
steroid-induced osteoporosis.30
Although this is only one of a plethora of published guidelines, it has
the benefit of clarity, conciseness and a practical approach. It is
possible that further studies will confirm our impressions that the
risks of bone loss are low for patients with uveitis, but pending such
studies the NOS guideline provides a useful safety protocol for the
ophthalmologist.
Patients using 5 mg of prednisolone or more per day for several
months or more should be considered at risk of bone loss. This will
exclude, for instance, those taking steroids for an average 8-10
weeks in the management of acute ocular toxoplasmosis. All such patients
should be informed about bone loss and other complications. Adequate
dietary calcium and vitamin D should be maintained (deficiency in a
Western diet is unusual but guidelines are readily available). If there
is any doubt about dietary intake or if the patient is relatively
immobile, supplementary calcium and vitamin D3 should be taken. Alcohol
intake should be limited to recommended norms. Smokers should be
encouraged to stop. Walking for the equivalent of two miles or more per
day should be encouraged if possible. Post-menopausal women already
using HRT should be encouraged to continue if risks are acceptable.
Patients should be screened for additional risk factors. If there are
none, if the patient is under 65 and the dosage is under 15 mg/day,
no further action is necessary. If the steroid dosage is >15 mg/day,
if the patient is over 65, or if there are additional risk factors, the
NOS guideline should be followed.
If treatment is considered necessary, the drug of choice for all
patients is a bisphosphonate. The optimum form of treatment for
steroid-induced bone loss is still subject to review, the two main
choices being cyclical etidronate with calcium, or weekly alendronate.
Post-menopausal women alternatively can use HRT, which will require the
agreement and cooperation of the general practitioner. Patients
requiring treatment also require assessment for additional risk factors.
If any patient has suffered a fracture, we recommend referral to a
physician with an expertise in the management of osteoporosis. We also
recommend such referral if a patient is intolerant of bisphosphonate
treatment (typically because of heartburn) or for any patient under 65
with osteoporosis (T < -2.5).
Systemic steroids remain the mainstay of treatment for most severe
inflammatory diseases despite the increasing availability of
immunosuppressives. However, immunosuppressives (most frequently
cyclosporin) were used in over one quarter of our patients in order to
lower steroid dosage. These drugs allow a reduction in steroid dose in
most patients, often by 50% or more and thus bone loss may be
ameliorated. However, it is known that cyclosporin itself causes
high-turnover bone loss, possibly by reducing testosterone in
combination with other effects.31,32,33
The combination of prednisolone and cyclosporin could theoretically
increase bone loss, but in this series only one of 27 patients using
cyclosporin was osteoporotic.
The frequency of male osteoporosis (14/68,
20.6%) in this study is striking, and all of these were 60 yrs or below.
In contrast only 6/61 women (9.8%) were
osteoporotic, and four of these were over 60 yrs. There is no
significant difference between the treatment parameters of males and
females in this study. The use of T < -2.5 to define osteoporosis in men
is not universally accepted as it is for women, because of the
technicalities of the interpretation of bone density.34,35
Young men have the greatest risk of high-impact fracture, and
osteoporosis is common in those with associated risk factors,36
especially hypogonadism. Men are also more susceptible to bone loss at
equivalent doses of steroid, than are premenopausal women.6
They should be considered an at-risk group37,38
and it is reasonable to define both male and female osteoporosis using
the same criteria.
In conclusion, steroid-induced osteoporosis is an important cause of
morbidity. This study suggests that its prevalence is lower in patients
with uveitis than in some other disease groups but has highlighted the
risk to young men. Bone loss can be reduced by optimising lifestyle and
diet, by the identification of pre-existing risk factors and by the use
of appropriate prophylaxis and treatment.
Acknowledgements
We
wish to acknowledge the support of the Iris Fund for Mr Stanford.
The authors have no financial or proprietary interest
in any device or medication reported in this article.
Figure 1 A typical bone densitometry scan of the upper femur.
Figure 2 The age distribution for (a) male and (b) female
patients in this series, showing the proportion in each age group with
normal bone density, osteopenia and osteoporosis.
Mission Statement -
Surface Hippy is a patient to patient guide to
hip resurfacing. It does not provide medical advice. It is designed to support,
not to replace, the relationship between patient and clinician.
Advertising - Revenue from this site is derived
from Google Ads, commercial advertising and individual donations.
Privacy - Surface Hippy does not share email
addresses or personal information with any group or organization.
Content - Surface Hippy is not controlled or influenced by any
medical companies, doctors or hospitals.
All content is controlled by Patricia Walter -
Joint Health Sites LLC