Dr. Mont Surface Hippy Meeting in Philadelphia 2006
Dr. Mont Interview
1. How did you get started with Hip Resurfacing and tell
us about your background and experience as a surgeon. Where did you train for
hip resurfacing? Who trained you? Did you continue your training after
starting resurfacing?
I began doing hemi-resurfacing for a disease called avascular necrosis or
osteonecrosis and sometimes called AVN for short. As some of you may know, this
is a disease that involves only the femoral head and is often associated with
alcohol abuse or corticosteroid use. Some of you may know that Bo Jackson’s hip
problems after getting a dislocation may have led to avascular necrosis which
was in the news. So, a traumatic insult such as a fracture or dislocation can
also lead to the disease. It’s notable that this affects a lot of young people
and eventually leads to arthritis. At one point we were doing hemi-resurfacing
which is only the femoral head part of the resurfacing procedure and I
originally started doing these because two of my mentors, Dr. David Hungerford
and Dr. Kenneth Krackow, had taught me this procedure. Some of the earlier
devices we used, for example, did not even have stems. They simply capped the
femoral head and I still believe today that the stemmed part of the device is
not that important for stability, it is more for teaching and for alignment
issues when you first begin performing these procedures.
I began doing the hemi-resurfacings in 1989 and continued doing these and it only
became possible to do full resurfacing when there was approval for the Wright
Medical trials which began in November of 2000. I did training with Harlan
Amstutz for a week and on other occasions with him before I did the full
resurfacing. I would also say that I continue my training after starting
resurfacing as does every good surgeon to the present day. We all should
continue to learn from the results and what we perform and I continuously train
surgeons in the most appropriate techniques for performing these procedures.
We keep track of all of our resurfacings in a database which also allows us to
analyze successes and failures and appropriate uses of the device.
2. Do you preserve neck capsule in your surgeries, can
you tell us a little about the reason for doing this and explain to us more in
detail exactly what it is?
I preserve some of the neck capsule in the procedures that I do that is along the
femoral neck and maybe involved in the femoral blood supply. I don’t typically
preserve as much as is needed in a posterior approach because I do an
anterolateral approach and lately I have been doing an anterior approach which
doesn’t go through any muscles. The anterior or anterolateral approaches have
much lower dislocation rates and do not need as much capsular preservation to
maintain stability.
In addition, I did find when doing both approaches that when the capsule is
repaired, it will often hypertrophy or get larger and this can lead to decreased
range of motion in some patients. The hypertrophy can be compared to an
adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder where there is restricted motion after the
repair when the body is trying to further repair the capsule. Since
dislocations are not a problem after anterolateral or anterior approaches, this
type of capsular repair is not as necessary as in a posterior approach where
this can be a problem.
3. What is the normal hospital stay barring any
complications?
Patients typically stay for two to three days. I perform the surgeries on
Mondays and Thursdays. If a patient comes in on a Monday, they typically will
go home Thursday morning. If they come in on a Thursday for surgery, they’ll go
home Sunday morning. Many patients will leave a day early in the afternoon.
There are some patients that can do this as an outpatient procedure or leave on
post-op day one, but I don’t prefer this approach.
4. What is your typical recovery time after resurfacing?
What is your typical rehab protocol? 90 degree restriction? Walker, Crutches
or Cane? Length of time used? Blood thinners? TED stockings? Ice? PT?
Patients are restricted only in the first five weeks to 50% weight bearing and a
90º rule and no crossing their legs. After five weeks, they advance to full
weight bearing with absolutely no restrictions on position and they start
strengthening. In summary, they use a cane or crutch for the first five weeks
with some restrictions of motion and these are lifted at five weeks.
We are presently working on some advanced rehabilitation
protocols that should be used for young patients. I believe that many of the
rehabilitation protocols that have been used in the past were developed for
typical patients that are getting standard total hip replacements who might have
an average age of approximately 72 years. In my patient population, the average
for resurfacing is 48 years and patients want to return to higher level
activities and may need different protocols. We are presently prospectively
analyzing these protocols.
Blood thinners, if patients have any history of any problems, are used for 42
days, but typically I will use aspirin for five to six weeks with mechanical
compression stockings. We often use ice for post-operative pain.
5. What approach do you use, posterior lateral or
anterior lateral? and why? What muscles/tendons are cut and do you sew them back
up or re-attach them?
The choice of approach to
use for resurfacing has received much attention and I believe extra “hype.” In
multiple studies now published, there are no reported clinical differences in
the short term and up to ten years of follow-up between anterior and posterior
approaches. I believe that any approach can be used and the surgeon should use
what they feel most comfortable.
Short-term differences that
patients may report with either approach have to do with other factors in my
opinion. I use the antero-lateral approach because it affords me easy exposure,
lower dislocation risk, less chance to disrupt the blood supply of the femoral
head---among other reasons. However, I have no problem with posterior
approaches and am currently working on and performing an even more minimally
invasive anterior approach in selected patients. Again, I would repeat that a
recent prospective randomized study showed no differences in all three
approaches.
In summary, the reasons I
use the anterolateral approach are as follows: 1) easier to perform; 2) less
chance for dislocation; 3) no difference in posterior approach at six months to
one year or in long-term studies; 4) increased range of motion from not having
to repair the capsule; and 5) multiple studies showing decreased effect on
femoral head blood supply.
Presently, I’m performing
an anterior approach which does not go through any muscles.
6. What is the recommended time you tell your patients before they can start
to run again/do impact sports? Are there any sports you don't want your
patients to participate in after surgery? What are some of the sports your
hip resurfacing patients have returned to?
Patients have returned to almost every sport one can conceive, including
marathon running and bungee jumping. I have professional athletes that want to
continue to play baseball, basketball and football at a high level. Whereas, I
don’t condone these activities, I like these patients to make sure that their
hip muscle strength is appropriate which is the best chance they have.
Typically, patients can run again at approximately three to four and a half
months after surgery, but this is a patient to patient variability and it really
depends on how strong their hips are and before they can do these activities, I
like a certain baseline level of strength approximately ten pounds of 30 reps on
each hip of the major muscle groups and that both hips are symmetrical.
We don't yet know the long term
effects of these sports (past 7 years) but I encourage patients to regularly
exercise their hip muscles to unload the joint if they are going to participate
The best sports in my
opinion are less impact - swimming, bicycling, elliptical - these are probably
fine - the higher impact sports are more likely to lower the lifespan of any
implant
I don't encourage running but
the patients do it anyway--in one of our studies we found that 30% of patients
returned to high impact sports--tennis, running, etc. after any hip arthroplasty
Many patients resume skiing and
hunting after resurfacing. I’m not a fan of skiing because of the problems with
a potential fall but I have many patients that ski anyway - for more personal
answer would have to contact me
Hockey is always pretty contact
so hard to gauge - would have to see x-rays but probably waiting 6 months does
not change cysts appreciably but again one needs to know what x-rays look like
today--if cysts already well formed this could decrease chance--most cysts are
miniscule and this would be an irrelevant factor.
7. What is your opinion about cementless (femoral)
devices for resurfacing?
Cementless femoral devices are being used by a few centers. Some previous
generations of designs had high failure rates (over 20%) and at this point,
these have to be viewed as experimental. In addition, many patients could not
get cementless devices because the bone of their femoral head is already
degenerated and has cysts and the bone wouldn’t grown into these devices in my
opinion and, therefore, cement is appropriate.
I
don’t think there’s a tremendous downside of using the cement in this
application as was for cemented devices for previous generations cemented hips
and do not believe this is a major issue. At this point, I would question the
use of this type of unproven technology that has also had higher failure rates
in the past.
8. Do you have a cut off age for resurfacing patients or
do you go on a case by case basis?
We
look at patients on a case by case basis. We have recently published a study of
patients over 60 years of age compared to patients less than 60 years of age and
found no difference in the results. Certainly, there are very active 60 to 70
year old patients that have much better bone stock than some inactive 40 year
old patients. They do not to be considered on a case by case basis and we have
actually done resurfacing in patients in their 70’s. One still has to view this
as cautionary because we do not know the long term results past 6 to 7 years of
resurfacing in these patients.
9. What type of anesthesia do you use, general or
epidural ?
The type of anesthesia used is on a case by case basis. We typically like to
do a spinal or epidural versus a general, since the cases typically take an hour
or less, the results of both are not very different in my hands.
10. Are there any cases that you will not take in
particular, AVN, dysplasia, small cysts. Maybe touch on some of the very
difficult cases you have been able to resurface.
We
have typically taken on very difficult cases which are sometimes considered
relative contraindications. For example, patients with avascular necrosis were
initially felt not to be appropriate candidates, but we have now done over 150
of them and our first report at close to 7 year follow-up showed success in 41
out of 42 patients. We have done resurfacing in patients with inflammatory
arthritis, like rheumatoid arthritis, in a small limited number of patients,
although I would not recommend this at the present time.
Again, each patient should be reviewed on a case by case basis and the risks and
benefits of doing a resurfacing versus a standard hip replacement should be
clearly laid out. Some patients may accept a two- to three-fold increased risk
for resurfacing and that might be worth it, whereas it may not be worth it for
other patients.
11. Do you do bilateral surgeries the same day, if not
how far apart do you recommend?
I
do bilateral surgeries, typically a week apart, if a patient would like that. I
don’t believe that the risks of doing unilateral surgery is way under 1% and I
personally do not believe that that risk stays under 1% if you do both at the
same time. There is time for turning the patient to their other side, putting
the dressing on, and doing a procedure. Two one hour procedures are much less
risky than one two to three hour procedure. In addition, other surgeons that
spend more time doing a single case, in my opinion would even be putting the
patient more at risk. Let’s keep the risk to the patient at the most minimal by
doing one hip at a time and doing it a week apart is not waiting too long.
12. If you can't perform a hip resurfacing, what THR
device do you prefer and why?
I
use different hip replacement devices depending on what the patient wants. Some
patients would like an extremely large femoral head and they can get a
metal-on-metal head that’s exactly like a resurfacing. Other patients, if they
can’t get a resurfacing, would like an interface that doesn’t involve
metal-on-metal interfaces and in that situation, I would do
ceramic-on-polyethylene because I think it has the lowest wear rate.
13. What do you consider an adequate number of surgeries
for a doctor to be proficient at hip resurfacing?
Some orthopaedic
surgeons can do the procedure well after less than twenty cases - others need
more. This is a hard question to answer. It may have to do with the type of
cases they are performing; are they gaining experience with straightforward hips
first and then advancing as they gain experience? This is the correct way which
is better than tackling hard cases too early.
14. How long do you feel it takes for the bone to be
fully healed, grow into the prosthesis?
Bone starts growing into the prosthetic shell immediately, but starts getting
fairly sticky by two weeks and then very strong at six weeks, but is not
completely healed probably until three to six months.
Questions and Answers from Dr. Mont Chats
1. What approach do you use?
The
choice of approach to use for resurfacing has received much
attention and I believe extra "hype." In multiple studies
now published, there are no reported clinical differences in
the short term and up to ten years of follow-up between
anterior and posterior approaches. I believe that any
approach can be used and the surgeon should use what they
feel most comfortable.
Short-term differences that patients may report with either
approach have to do with other factors in my opinion. I use
the antero-lateral approach because it affords me easy
exposure, lower dislocation risk, less chance to disrupt the
blood supply of the femoral head - among other reasons.
However, I have no problem with posterior approaches and am
currently working on an even more minimally invasive
anterior approach. Again, I would repeat that a recent
prospective randomized study showed no differences in all
three approaches.
2.
How heavy is the equipment that you can lift when
you are fully recovered?
It is
difficult to give you an exact answer. Obviously, this
varies from person to person. Typically, surgeons do not
recommend lifting greater than 20-30 pounds on a regular
basis after any hip replacement. This is because the extra
force on the hip is believed to accelerate wear of the
prostheses which could lead to premature failure of the
device. However, no one really knows the answers to the
question of what is too much weight that leads to
accelerated wear. We don’t know if there is a threshold for
which staying underneath a level of weight doesn’t lead to
appreciable wear or are there other factors—immunological,
activity levels, etc. that are more important.
I
usually tell patients that completely sedentary activities
will probably afford the best chances of devices lasting 20
years or longer and that patients that do heavy lifting or
other high impact activities may lead to prosthetic survival
of less than ten years—I have two patients that run
marathons yearly. There is a difference in what patients
are capable of doing and what they should do.
I do
believe that if one wants to regularly lift greater than 30
pounds or participate in high impact activities, then they
should regularly keep their hip muscles strong. I know from
a study we did that at least 30% of patients will
participate in these activities despite surgeon advice to
the contrary. Therefore, keep your hip muscles strong to
protect your prosthesis!!
The
exercises I advocate encompass 20 minutes every other
day—about an hour per week to specifically strengthen your
hip abductors, flexors, and extensors. You can get a copy
of these exercise sheets from me - call the office at (410)
601-8500
3. How soon can you start lifting?
If one
is going to lift, it should be done when the hip muscles
are back to close to normal in strength. I advocate
getting ankle weights and achieving a certain level of hip
strength before lifting.
Also
remember that there is a difference between simply lifting
something without walking in which case the 50 pound weight
is distributed to both hips and effectively is 25 pounds of
force on each hip. Not so bad. If you lift and then
walk with the object then the 50 pounds that one is carrying
gets multiplied by 3 every time one takes a step on that
side, so for each step its 150 pounds of weight.
The
same analogy hold for weight loss—if you lose 33 pounds your
saving 100 pounds of wear and tear on your hip with each
step. So, the average person takes about 2000 steps or more
in a typical day - so losing 33 pounds saves 100 tons per
day on your hip. Imagine how that might save certain people
from even needing joint replacements if they lost the
weight. Weight loss can probably help prolong survival of
the prosthesis, among the other benefits.
4. Since I hunt, after a hip resurfacing, are there
limits to how much extra weight (backpack) one should carry?
There is a difference in what a patient might be able to do,
what they can do, and what they should do. If one exercises
appropriately post-operatively almost every patient could
get to close to normal function and be able to lift weights,
backpacks, etc. This is not something I would necessarily
encourage but the patient has to decide whether the risks of
possible premature wear of their components are worth the
benefits of the activity they love.
5. When do you consider arthroscopy of
the hip ?
Arthroscopies
work if minimal to no arthritis, otherwise they are not too
useful. Most candidates for resurfacing would not be
candidates for arthroscopy.
6. How do you deal with metal allergies if you are
considering resurfacing?
First of all, one has to know what you are allergic to.
Nickel allergies are probably ok since resurfacings have
minimal to no nickel, but you should be tested for cobalt
and chromium before a metal-on-metal device if one has a
metal allergy.
Traditional skin testing for allergies are not great--there are blood
tests at specialized labs that do better tests though this
is a field that still needs more research. Four to five
labs will do the blood tests from around the country.
The blood tests show antigenic-antibody reactions to the
metals tested from the patients blood--if positive one
should not get metal on metal devices in my opinion
7. What Device do you use?
I use multiple devices; Conserve Plus, BHR, and Cormet. I
use all of the devices--they are similar but each has subtle
differences in fixation surfaces, etc.
8. Can metal allergies cause hip bursitis?
Hip bursitis typically does not occur
from metal allergies.
9. Is hip bursitis common in the operated hip after
resurfacing?
Hip bursitis can be common after any hip surgery
- most
of the time >99% it is self-limited and will go away by
itself or with minimal non-operative treatment.
10. Have you ever performed the surgical removal of the
bursa as a last resort of hip bursitis?
I have performed about 5 surgical bursectomies in my career
of over 7000 procedures - but most have been after revision
surgeries - often when there was a wire-ing of the
trochanter which was an older way to approach hip which is
rarely used today - most bursitis will respond to
non-operative treatment--therapy, occasional injections,
etc.
11. Are bone spurs on the femoral neck a contraindication
for hip resurfacing?
Bone spurs on femoral neck are not a contraindication
for resurfacing--but obviously each x-ray would have to be
looked at individually--almost all arthritis is associated
with spurs on neck by the way
12. Are their Age Limits for resurfacing?
Most people use about 55 - 60 years as an age limit for
surgery - however we just had a paper accepted for
resurfacings on patients greater than 60 years and they did
just as well as their younger counterparts.
Age is a relative thing and this is a controversial topic
13. Training-How many does a Surgeon Needs to do for
competence?
Some orthopaedic surgeons can do the procedure well
after less than twenty cases - others need more - This is a
hard question to answer - It may have to do with the type of
cases they are performing--are they gaining experience with
straightforward hips first and then advancing as they gain
experience? -- which is correct way which is better than
tackling hard cases too early
14. Exercise: Is it needed Pre-Surgery?
Two studies in the literature have not found any benefit of
pre-operative exercise on eventual results of resurfacing or
any hip replacement - so don't mind if you exercise ahead of
time but don't feel obligated
15. When can’t you do a Resurfacing on Socket Side?
All arthritis generally involves socket changes
- it is the
extremes of bone loss that may not allow resurfacing since
screw fixation is not optimal with resurfacing devices at
present. Many companies working on this though at present.
16. I understand that cysts can render the bone unsuitable
for resurfacing. What are the risk factors for developing
cysts?
Almost all arthritis leads to cysts - it's just a matter of
degree--the longer you wait or tolerate arthritis in general
the larger the cysts will become - sometimes patients may
wait too long to get a resurfacing because the cysts erode
away the bone stock on the femoral head - but these are
typically very late stage arthritis
17. Why are metal ions are a concern when the concentrations
are low (parts per billion?) and we have iron in the blood
anyway? Sometimes we take iron supplements to increase iron
in the blood to prevent anemia.
We do not know a lot about these low concentrations of metal
ions at the present time
18. Can we perform Sports after resurfacing?
Concerning sports - many patients with standard total hip
replacements as well as resurfacing participate in all
sports.
We don't yet know the long term effects of these sports
(past 7 years) but I encourage patients to regularly
exercise their hip muscles to unload the joint if they are
going to participate.
The best sports in my opinion are less impact
- swimming,
bicycling, elliptical - these are probably fine - the
higher impact sports are more likely to lower the lifespan
of any implant.
I don't encourage running but the patients do it anyway
- in
one of our studies we found that 30% of patients returned to
high impact sports--tennis, running, etc. after any hip arthroplasty.
19. Should I lose weight before surgery? Will I lose
afterwards?
I am sure if one has a successful result of any arthroplasty
it may help patients be more active and lose weight - this
makes sense. Unfortunately, in a few published studies
patients still have average weight gains after joint
replacements.
We just finished a study of over 200 patients after hip
replacement and found an average weight loss for the group
of 4%. The highest predictor of patients who lost weight
were those who have active pre-operative lifestyles.
20. Can you Ski after resurfacing?
Many patients resume skiing and hunting after resurfacing.
I'm not a fan of skiing because of the problems with a
potential fall but I have many patients that ski
anyway - for more personal answer would have to contact me
Hockey is always pretty contact so hard to gauge
- would
have to see x-rays but probably waiting 6 months does not
change cysts appreciably but again one needs to know what
x-rays look like today - if cysts already well formed this
could decrease chance--most cysts are miniscule and this
would be an irrelevant factor
21. When do you take antibiotics before resurfacing?
All patients in every hospital in the country get
pre-operative antibiotics within 1 hour of
surgery - mandated hospital rules which is a good thing
22. Do you suggest antibiotics before dental work after
resurfacing and for how long?
Patients with inflammatory arthritis which you have are not
always the best candidates for resurfacing. That's because the bone is generally weaker. Psoriatic
arthritis though needs to be evaluated on a case by case
basis.
Any surgery or trauma can lead to a flare up though
this can be controlled so typically patients just need to be
monitored if they are getting any surgery.
I would install a Birmingham or Cormet depending on patient
preference. Sometimes the choice of device is limited by
patient size as Cormet doesn't have smaller sizes.
If one has true osteopenia one should not be getting
a resurfacing. There is a higher risk of femoral neck
fracture.
Osteopenia is a term for bone loss that can arise from many
conditions: osteoporosis (what you get as you age), disuse
osteopenia (if you don't walk on you hip),
osteomalacia--Vitamin D disorder--get your sunshine--all
have varying degrees of bone loss.
Small boned women have thinner necks and could be more
susceptible to femoral neck fractures. For example a women
with bone half the diameter of a man which is common will
have one eighth of the bending strength or only 12.5% of
that man.
Not sure what you mean by pin size--in case yes--they are
similar and not really relevant in my opinion
May be true but no scientific data to support this one way
or the other.
The post is probably irrelevant - these devices would do
fine without posts in most cases - don't think that any one
company has monopoly on small women - many can deal with
small size issues.
37. Any thoughts about two opposing actions recommended by
doctors? 1. if you are looking for a THR most docs ask you
to wait as long as you can. 2. If you are looking for BHR,
it appears that if you wait to long, it could be a problem.
Most doc in this case would tell you to get the procedure as
soon as you can so one does not cause any more damage?
I think you may be confusing extremes - some people wait way
too long - till their practically wheel-chair bound and then
they want a resurfacing and find out its too late. So,- to
some extent correct. But you shouldn't rush into a
resurfacing if you don't need it.
38. What type of data do you use for evaluating bone
strength prior to a hip resurfacing?
I look at X-rays to initially check bone quality. some docs
get DEXA scans but I don't. After the x-ray, my assessments
are made intra-operatively to check strength and quality of
bone.
39. Does the femoral fracture in small women occur after
surgery due to a fall or accident or does this occur in
surgery?
Femoral fractures we are talking about occur after surgery.
If they happened during surgery which is quite rare then the
patient would get a standard total hip replacement and not
even be discussing a resurfacing fracture.
40. Are small women at risk for femoral fractures from the
surgery date and then on forever?
Small women at risk initially mostly in 1st year. Then risk
probably lowers though we don't know what happens later on
with longer follow-up as some women become post-menopausal
and lose bone stock and are more susceptible to femoral neck
fractures then men as they get older.
41. I'm worried about waiting too long. I was diagnosed 3
years ago. I'm ready for it now psychologically and
physically. Did I cause damage by waiting? I'm able to walk
basically with very little limp at this stage but I do feel
pain each day.
The time frame is quite variable - a hip can go in a short
time only in rare cases less than one year (Rapidly
progressive osteoarthritis) - 3% or in cases of inflammatory
arthritis. Many cases it is a gradual loss of bone. Many
people that lose too much bone will feel a limb length
discrepancy - though this is all conjecture - a simple look
at x-ray tells the story!
42. Can the improper placement of the cap and cup - as far
as the proper angles, etc - cause a fracture at a later date
because of unusual stresses to the bone?
Improper placement can make one more susceptible to a later
fracture.
43. A lot of hype about athletes, impact sports and hip
resurfacing. Have these devices lasted at least 10 years for
such athletes?
We don't yet know the long term effects of these sports
(past 7 years) but I encourage patients to regularly
exercise their hip muscles to unload the joint if they are
going to participate. The best sports in my opinion are less impact -
swimming, bicycling, elliptical - these are probably fine -
the higher impact sports are more likely to lower the
lifespan of any implant. I don't encourage
running but the patients do it anyway - in one of our
studies we found that 30% of patients returned to high
impact sports.
The data is OK for about 7 years for the athletes - past
that it's anyone's guess.
44. Is resurfacing like a set of tires? We only have so many
"miles" before the it wears out? In your opinion, does high
impact exercise speed up the wear?
Tire analogy for resurfacing is generally correct - but we
don't have all the answers - see my earlier answer about
wear.
45. What is the expected life span of an average hip
resurfacing vs. a total hip replacement?
Resurfacings have only been used for 8-11 years - doing well
so we can't really guess or take this out to much past that
- they hopefully will last many years past that. Some
standard total hip designs do great into their 15-20th year.
46. Does the device wear out or does the device wear the
bone out with the high impact life?
The device wears out - then will lead to wear of bone
secondarily.
47. Here's a sensitive issue... What is the primary
difference between doctors? If we shop for a car, we can use
consumer reports etc. How do we judge a doctors ability,
especially in America.
Some orthopaedic surgeons can do the procedure well after
less than twenty cases - others need more - This is a hard
question to answer - It may have to do with the type of
cases they are performing - are they gaining experience with
straightforward hips first and then advancing as they gain
experience? - which is correct way which is better than
tackling hard cases too early
48. Do you install full size metal hip replacements if hip
resurfacing is not an option? Is this better than the
traditional hip replacement (with a smaller femoral head)?
I do large femoral heads if can't do resurfacing
49. If you need to use a THR for a younger person, do you
prefer a Metal on Metal or Ceramic on Ceramic.
I prefer ceramic on polyethylene - avoids metal on metal
issues and avoids possible squeaking issues
50. Will the larger femoral heads help with range of motion?
What are your restrictions if THR is needed?
Large heads may help with range of motion - I give no
restrictions with both procedures
51. Why are all resurfacing procedures done with MOM. Why
don't they make devices for this out of other materials?
They are trying other materials but still experimental - at
present would need too thick ceramics or other issues - but
in a few years maybe newer materials
52. Ceramic on polyethylene. This is a smaller head,
correct?
Smaller - but not that much smaller - can still use a 36-40
millimeter head! which is bigger than traditional 26-32mm
53. What is your phone Number?/ e-mail?
My phone number at the office is (410)
601-8500. Ask for Terri, Colleen, Jean, or Jill. I will be
happy to call you if you send x-rays and a brief history.
My e-mail is
Rhondamont@aol.com
but would like to answer individual questions when I see
actual x-rays.