Surface Hippy A Patient to Patient Guide to Hip Resurfacing

Surface Hippy

A Patient to Patient Guide About Hip Resurfacing

Surface Hippy is Patricia Walter's Personal Project to help people lean about Hip Resurfacing
Patricia is the fulltime author, editor, webmaster and owner of the site

 

Roger Linfield

Obtaining Insurance Coverage for HR in Belgium

RBHR De Smet Jan. 11, 2005

"I was able to return to my pre-surgery climbing level after six months, and was quite active in the second half of 2005 with climbing and hiking."

From: climber_roger
To: surfacehippy@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 10:44 PM
Subject: [surfacehippy] Success with U.S. Insurance (LONG)

Eleven months after surgery in Belgium, I finally obtained insurance
reimbursement for 100% of my medical expenses. Here are details.

My health insurance is an ERISA plan. This means that my employer is self-
insured, but hires a health insurance company (Aetna in this case) to
administer the plan. My employer, along with a committee of health
professionals, assembled a "Medical Plan" – a specific set of rules on what is
and is not covered. Upon reading through the Medical Plan, I couldn't find
anything that specifically precluded coverage for out-of-country hip
resurfacing. However, the relevant criteria for coverage were subjective (e.g.
established as being effective for the condition to be treated), so coverage
was clearly not guaranteed. The rules of my company's Medical Plan differ in
a number of ways from the coverage you would get with normal Aetna health
insurance.

Two months after surgery, when the final hospital bill arrived, I submitted my
initial claim letter. In this letter, I addressed each of the listed criteria in the
Medical Plan, gave my argument why hip resurfacing qualified, and quoted
text from the FDA's position and from Aetna's own health insurance (they
cover it).

After a few months, Aetna notified me that they had denied my claim. When I
asked for the reason, they gave me a very vague explanation – essentially
saying that hip resurfacing didn't meet all the relevant criteria. I pressed for a
more specific explanation. They replied that there was a "lack of clinical
evidence [for the effectiveness of the procedure]" and then told me to stop
pestering them. They had given me an approach to take for an appeal.

My appeal had two main parts. The first was a list of five recent (since 2003)
peer reviewed, published papers on the results of hip resurfacing. The
references for these papers are given at the end of this post. I had been given
a copy of the Amstutz et al. paper by Dr. Paul Beaule, whom I had seen pre-
surgery for a consultation. The British Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery sent
me free copies of the two papers from their journal after I sent an email
request. For the two papers in Hip International, which is published in Italy, I
was only able to obtain the abstracts (available free from the web site listed at
the bottom of this post). There is an on-line system for purchasing access to
the full text of a paper, but this system is in Italian and I was unsure how to
navigate through it. Therefore, my appeal letter had the bibliographic
information for all five papers, with copies of the full text of three of the papers
and printouts of the abstracts for the other two. I think that this set of five
papers was what won the appeal.

The second part of my appeal was a description of why this surgery was the
right choice for me. Here is a lightly edited version:


"In December, 2004, shortly before my surgery, my right hip pain was so bad
that I could not stand up to give a 15 minute presentation at work, even with
the use of a cane. My job requires that I give regular presentations to co-
workers and to potential customers. Just a few months after the surgery, I was
able to stand up comfortably for an hour, without a cane, and could give
presentations again.

Hip resurfacing was the best choice for my health, since it allows a higher
post-op activity level than a total hip replacement. This higher activity level
will help me to maintain a lean body weight and to keep my blood pressure
and cholesterol low.

Hip resurfacing was the best economic choice because it cost only 30% as
much as a total hip replacement, and the available data suggests that the
lifetime of my resurfaced hip will be at least as long as for a total hip
replacement for someone of my age and activity level."


My appeal letter contained eight attachments, each boldly labeled with a
cover sheet. One attachment had the bibliographic information (the list at the
end of this posting) for the five papers. A second attachment had copies of
the three papers from The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American and
British), with the abstracts from the other two papers in a third attachment. A
fourth attachment was a letter of support from an American hip-resurfacing
surgeon (Dr. Beaule). A fifth was a copy of my initial claim letter. A sixth was
a copy of Aetna's denial of coverage notice. My point is that I included all
relevant information in a way that was clearly labeled. Even so, additional
clarification was needed (see the next paragraph).

After two months (and an email reminder to Aetna), they notified me that they
would pay $13,900 out of my $14,800 claim. A week later, they decided to
only pay $6700. An inquiry revealed that an Aetna auditor thought that $8000
of my expenses were for the Holiday Inn in Gent. I explained that my lodging
was billed separately, but that visits to the Holiday Inn by a nurse and a
physical therapist after surgery were part of my claim. Then Aetna decided to
pay all of the $14,800. The complete hospital bill was part of my initial claim
letter, but it had obviously confused some people at Aetna.

ADVICE
The people who work in the claims department of an insurance company are
accustomed to getting standard claims on standard forms from doctor's offices
and hospitals. If you submit a surgery claim yourself, especially if it's for an
overseas procedures, you need to do everything possible to help out the
person processing your claim. Carefully label every piece of documentation,
and clearly refer to it in the text of your letter. Include an itemized list of every
expense. The person in your insurance company won't necessarily be
opposed to your claim, but he/she will certainly want to be sure that money is
paid only for valid expenses. Thorough and even somewhat redundant
documentation is helpful.

Roger
RBHR De Smet
Jan. 11, 2005

List of recent peer-reviewed publications on hip resurfacing (chronological
order)

"Is the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Worthwhile?"
T. C. B. Pollard, C. Basu, R. Ainsworth, W. Lai, and G. C. Bannister, Hip
International, volume 13, pp. 25 - 28, 2003.

"Development of Metal/Metal Hip Resurfacing"
D. J. W. McMinn, Hip International, volume 13, pp. 41 – 53, 2003.

"Metal-on-Metal Hybrid Surface Arthroplasty: Two to Six-Year Follow-up
Study"
Harlan C. Amstutz, Paul E. Beaule, Frederick J. Dorey, Michel J. Le Duff, Pat
A. Campbell, and Thomas A. Gruen,, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery,
volume 86-A, Number 1, pp. 28 – 39, January, 2004.

"Metal-on-Metal Resurfacing of the Hip in Patients Under the Age of 55"
J. Danial, P. B. Pynsent, and D. J. W. McMinn, The Journal of Bone and Joint
Surgery, volume 86-B, pp. 177 – 184, March, 2004.

Early Results of Primary Birmingham Hip Resurfacings: An Independent
Prospective Study of the First 230 Hips"
D. L. Back, R. Dalziel, D. Young, and A. Shimmin, The Journal of Bone and
Joint Surgery, volume 87-B, pp. 324 - 329, March, 2005.

Note: for The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, the "A" in the volume
number designates the American voume, and the "B" designates the British
volume.

The web sites for the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery are:
<http://www.ejbjs.org/> American volume
<http://www.jbjs.org.uk/> British volume

The web site for Hip International is: <http://www.hip-int.com/index.asp?a=>
current

 


L10 Web Stats Reporter 3.15 LevelTen Hit Counter - Free PHP Web Analytics Script
LevelTen dallas web development firm - website design, flash, graphics & marketing
Contact Patricia

Advertisements

Advertise on
Surface Hippy

 

8000
Unique Visitors
per month use
Surface Hippy


Contact Patricia

Hip Talk generates over 50,000 page views a month.

Surface Hippy would like to Thank the many supporters of the website. 

The website content is not controlled by any medical companies, doctors or hospitals.

 

What's New?

Dr. Bose presented plaque by overseas patients

Dr. Bob Arnot's Bi-lat hip resurfacing story with Dr. Su

What hip resurfacing device is most popular?

Hip Resurfacing Surgeons Video Interviews

Web design by Patricia Walter Copyright Surface Hippy 2006

Statistics Page

Mission Statement - Surface Hippy is a patient to patient guide to hip resurfacing. It does not provide medical advice. It is designed to support, not to replace, the relationship between patient and clinician.
Advertising - Revenue from this site is derived from Google Ads, commercial advertising and individual donations.
Privacy - Surface Hippy does not share email addresses or personal information with any group or organization.
Content - Surface Hippy is not controlled or influenced by any medical companies, doctors or hospitals.
All content is controlled by Patricia Walter  -
Joint Health Sites  LLC