Surface Hippy A Patient to Patient Guide to Hip Resurfacing

Surface Hippy

A Patient to Patient Guide About Hip Resurfacing

Surface Hippy is Patricia Walter's Personal Project to help people lean about Hip Resurfacing
Patricia is the fulltime author, editor, webmaster and owner of the site

 

Study About Total Hip Replacement Revisions

This article is from the DGReview

DGReview

Surgeon Volume Influences Rate of Total Hip Replacement Revision
A DGReview of :"Early failures of total hip replacement: Effect of surgeon volume"
Arthritis & Rheumatism

04/28/2004
By Emma Hitt, PhD

Patients treated by surgeons who perform few total hip replacements (THR) per year are more likely to undergo revision THR, particularly within the first 18 months of surgery, than are patients treated by high-volume surgeons, a new report suggests.

Hip prostheses function well for up to 20 years in at least 80% of patients, and failure rates are less than 1% per year. However, it is unclear whether failure rates vary by surgeon and hospital volumes.

Elena Losina, MD, with the Department of Biostatistics, at the Boston University School of Public Health, Massachusetts, United States, and colleagues investigated whether provider volume was associated with revision rate of THR.

The researchers evaluated the records of 57 488 Medicare beneficiaries who underwent elective primary THR from 1995-1996 in 3044 hospitals in the United States. The definition of primary THR failure was a subsequent revision THR, determined in hospital claims by the International Classification of Diseases Ninth Revision codes.

Hospitals were stratified based on volume: low (less than 25 THRs/year), medium (26-50, 51-100 THRs/year), and high (more than 100 THRs/year). In addition, surgeons performing less than 12 elective primary THRs annually in the Medicare population were considered low volume.

A proportional hazard model was used to determine the association between the rates of revision and surgeon volume. Hospital volume, patient age, poverty status, sex, and comorbidities were taken into account. The researchers also examined whether there was a difference in revision rate before and after 18 months based on surgeon volume.

Of the 57 488 patients who had elective primary THR in 1995-1996, 4.4% had at least 1 revision THR by the end of 1999. Of those, 56.6% occurred within the first 18 months.

"Further population-based studies are needed to better understand the role of the type of implant on this association," Dr. Losina and colleagues conclude. "In addition, studies are needed to determine whether volume influences later failure (e.g., after 10 years of followup)."

According to the researchers, clinicians should consider surgeon volume among the factors influencing their referrals for elective THR.

Arthritis Rheum 2004;50:1338-1343. "Early failures of total hip replacement: Effect of surgeon volume"

L10 Web Stats Reporter 3.15 LevelTen Hit Counter - Free PHP Web Analytics Script
LevelTen dallas web development firm - website design, flash, graphics & marketing

Web design by Patricia Walter Copyright Surface Hippy 2006

Statistics Page

Mission Statement - Surface Hippy is a patient to patient guide to hip resurfacing. It does not provide medical advice. It is designed to support, not to replace, the relationship between patient and clinician.
Advertising - Revenue from this site is derived from Google Ads, commercial advertising and individual donations.
Privacy - Surface Hippy does not share email addresses or personal information with any group or organization.
Content - Surface Hippy is not controlled or influenced by any medical companies, doctors or hospitals.
All content is controlled by Patricia Walter  -
Joint Health Sites  LLC